Current:Home > MyWisconsin voters are deciding whether to ban private money support for elections -AssetTrainer
Wisconsin voters are deciding whether to ban private money support for elections
View
Date:2025-04-12 08:03:33
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Wisconsin voters on Tuesday were deciding on two Republican-backed constitutional amendments, one of which would ban the use of private money to run elections in reaction to grants received in 2020 that were funded by Facebook creator Mark Zuckerberg.
The other proposal would require that only election officials designated by law can administer elections. That is already the law, but adding that language to the Wisconsin Constitution would make it harder to repeal.
Democrats opposed both measures, which they argued would make it more difficult to conduct elections in the presidential battleground state.
Polls are open 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. following an early, in-person absentee voting period that began two weeks ago.
Both proposed constitutional amendments are in response to grant money that came to Wisconsin in 2020 from the Center for Tech and Civic Life, a liberal group that fights for voter access. That year, the center received a $300 million donation from Zuckerberg and his wife Priscilla Chan to help election officials buy supplies and run elections at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic before vaccines were available.
The state’s five largest cities, all of which President Joe Biden won, received $8.8 million. They were among roughly 200 communities in Wisconsin that received around $10 million as part of $350 million given out nationally.
Republicans who dubbed the money “Zuckerbucks” complained the bulk of the funds went to Democratic strongholds and claimed it was an attempt by the billionaire to tip the vote in favor of Democrats. The argument came amid false claims made by former President Donald Trump and his supporters that widespread voter fraud led to Biden’s 2020 win.
Since 2020, Republicans in at least 27 states have outlawed or restricted private elections grants.
The Wisconsin measures are supported by Republicans and conservative groups, including the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty and Election Integrity for Wisconsin. They are opposed by an array of government watchdog and liberal groups including the American Civil Liberties Union, Common Cause Wisconsin, Wisconsin Conservation Voters and the League of Women Voters of Wisconsin.
Not a single Democratic lawmaker voted for the amendment, which was then split into two questions on the ballot. Opponents of the amendments worry they could lead to attempts to stifle current practices enhancing voter participation.
Three courts and the bipartisan Wisconsin Elections Commission rejected complaints challenging the legality of the grant money.
Republicans, who control the Legislature, brought the constitutional amendments to circumvent Democratic Gov. Tony Evers, who almost surely would have vetoed the measures. Amendments are not subject to the governor’s approval.
Wisconsin voters have approved 148 out of 200 proposed constitutional amendments since the state constitution was adopted in 1848, according to the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau.
veryGood! (6)
Related
- Who are the most valuable sports franchises? Forbes releases new list of top 50 teams
- Actor Julian Sands Found Dead on California's Mt. Baldy 6 Months After Going Missing
- As Illinois Strains to Pass a Major Clean Energy Law, a Big Coal Plant Stands in the Way
- Batteries are catching fire at sea
- See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
- On the Defensive a Year Ago, the American Petroleum Institute Is Back With Bravado
- Barack Obama drops summer playlist including Ice Spice, Luke Combs, Tina Turner and Peso Pluma
- You won the lottery or inherited a fortune. Now what?
- Warm inflation data keep S&P 500, Dow, Nasdaq under wraps before Fed meeting next week
- Evan Ross and Ashlee Simpson's Kids Are Ridiculously Talented, Just Ask Dad
Ranking
- Trump's 'stop
- Saudis, other oil giants announce surprise production cuts
- Saudis, other oil giants announce surprise production cuts
- New $2 billion Oklahoma theme park announced, and it's not part of the Magic Kingdom
- NHL in ASL returns, delivering American Sign Language analysis for Deaf community at Winter Classic
- Climate Activists and Environmental Justice Advocates Join the Gerrymandering Fight in Ohio and North Carolina
- The Navy Abandons a Plan to Develop a Golf Course on a Protected Conservation Site Near the Naval Academy in Annapolis
- Labor's labors lost? A year after stunning victory at Amazon, unions are stalled
Recommendation
Opinion: Gianni Infantino, FIFA sell souls and 2034 World Cup for Saudi Arabia's billions
Google's 'Ghost Workers' are demanding to be seen by the tech giant
Hailey Bieber Breaks the Biggest Fashion Rule After She Wears White to a Friend's Wedding
Too many subscriptions, not enough organs
Alex Murdaugh’s murder appeal cites biased clerk and prejudicial evidence
ChatGPT is temporarily banned in Italy amid an investigation into data collection
With Trump Gone, Old Fault Lines in the Climate Movement Reopen, Complicating Biden’s Path Forward
The Perseids — the best meteor shower of the year — are back. Here's how to watch.