Current:Home > MarketsExxon Relents, Wipes Oil Sands Reserves From Its Books -AssetTrainer
Exxon Relents, Wipes Oil Sands Reserves From Its Books
View
Date:2025-04-13 03:56:08
ExxonMobil announced Wednesday that it had wiped off its books all 3.5 billion barrels of tar sands oil reserves at one of its projects in Canada. Because of recent low oil prices, the company said none of those reserves can be considered economical according to the accounting rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The accounting change at its Kearl project, a momentous if expected development, represented a turnaround for the company, which has long resisted calls to revise its reserves estimates. Over the past decade, Exxon had steadily increased its holdings in Canada’s tar sands to become a leading producer there.
Exxon also removed from its books 800 million barrels of oil-equivalent reserves in North America, though the reductions were offset by the addition of 1 billion barrels of oil and gas elsewhere.
Exxon said in October that low prices would likely force it to “de-book” up to 4.6 billion barrels of reserves in its end-of-year accounting. Securities and Exchange Commission rules allow oil companies to count reserves only if they are profitable based on average prices over the previous year.
But while the accounting change removes billions of dollars worth of tar sands investments from the company’s annual report, and is watched closely by investors, it will not directly affect operations. Exxon plans to continue operating its Kearl project, and said it will add back the reserves if oil prices rise or costs drop. After the reduction, the company now reports holding 1.3 billion barrels of tar sands reserves.
Exxon will hold an analyst meeting on March 1.
Earlier this week, ConocoPhillips said it had reduced its oil sands reserves by more than 1 billion barrels, bringing its total to 1.2 billion for 2016. These moves had been expected, as low oil prices have placed a heavy burden on tar sands projects, which are among the most expensive and polluting sources of oil.
veryGood! (287)
Related
- Stamford Road collision sends motorcyclist flying; driver arrested
- Massachusetts Raises the Bar (Just a Bit) on Climate Ambition
- Ashley Tisdale Enters Her French Girl Era With New Curtain Bangs
- Thousands of Low-Income Residents in Flooded Port Arthur Suffer Slow FEMA Aid
- Jamie Foxx reps say actor was hit in face by a glass at birthday dinner, needed stitches
- Woman hit and killed by stolen forklift
- Clouds of Concern Linger as Wildfires Drag into Flu Season and Covid-19 Numbers Swell
- Keystone Pipeline Spills 383,000 Gallons of Oil into North Dakota Wetlands
- See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
- NASCAR contractor electrocuted to death while setting up course for Chicago Street Race
Ranking
- Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
- Migrant workers said to be leaving Florida over new immigration law
- These Cities Want to Ban Natural Gas. But Would It Be Legal?
- Stranded motorist shot dead by trooper he shot after trooper stopped to help him, authorities say
- North Carolina trustees approve Bill Belichick’s deal ahead of introductory news conference
- AEP Cancels Nation’s Largest Wind Farm: 3 Challenges Wind Catcher Faced
- BMX Rider Pat Casey Dead at 29 After Accident at Motocross Park
- Did Exxon Mislead Investors About Climate-Related Risks? It’s Now Up to a Judge to Decide.
Recommendation
Macy's says employee who allegedly hid $150 million in expenses had no major 'impact'
Court: Trump’s EPA Can’t Erase Interstate Smog Rules
After Dozens of Gas Explosions, a Community Looks for Alternatives to Natural Gas
Puerto Rico Considers 100% Renewable Energy, But Natural Gas May Come First
Paris Hilton, Nicole Richie return for an 'Encore,' reminisce about 'The Simple Life'
BelVita Breakfast Sandwich biscuits recalled after reports of allergic reactions
Man accused of running over and killing woman with stolen forklift arrested
How Much Damage are Trump’s Solar Tariffs Doing to the U.S. Industry?